contestada

Loretto owned an apartment building in New York City. A New York state law allowed her to collect only $1 from the cable company who installed a television cable to her building. She challenged the constitutionality of this law on the grounds that it allowed the taking of her property without just compensation. Do you think it does? Why or why not?

Respuesta :

Parrain

Based on the fact that the cable company could install a cable without an owner's permission and compel them to receive payment, Loretto is justified in challenging the constitutionality of the law.

Why is Loretto justified in her constitutional action?

The Constitution states that the government cannot take the land of a person unless they do so for the good of the community and that they have to provide just compensation.

The Cable Company is taking Loretto's land to install the cable and they aren't paying her just compensation. She therefore has the right to sue them on Constitutional law alleging that they are taking her property without just compensation.

Find out more on Loretto's case at https://brainly.com/question/4093383

#SPJ1

Otras preguntas