Respuesta :
Roger Sherman's argument in favor of equal representation in the Senate could be justified because he believed that Small states are easier to manage politically, while large states are more likely to be corrupt.
What was Roger Sherman's argument?
Roger Sherman was from the small state of Connecticut which meant that equal representation would favor his state in the Senate and so he argued vigorously for it.
His main logic was the fact that because small states were small, they were easier to manage when it came to political leadership which meant that they would show a lot of vigor in governance. This would be unlike large states which have so many things going on that they are more likely to be corrupt.
Find out more on Roger Sherman at https://brainly.com/question/855084
#SPJ1
Answer:
A - Small states are easier to manage politically, while large states are more likely to be corrupt.
Explanation:
EDGE 2022