contestada

Essay Prompt; I need someone to please give me a thesis statement for it.
-
Physical harm is often asserted as the boundary of where an individual's freedom ends. If I physically harm myself or others, then the law requires me to stop. At what point should an idea be silenced by a community, or should ALL ideas be shared with complete freedom? (In other words, what ideas are "okay" versus taboo? Who gets to decide?)

Respuesta :

Answer:

Here are three potential thesis statements :)

1. The line between what is considered "acceptable" and "taboo" is often blurred, and is up to interpretation by individuals and communities.

2. The freedom to share ideas should not be limited by the fear of offending others or breaking social norms.

3. There should be a balance between respecting individual freedoms and protecting the safety of others.

Explanation:

Give me Brainliest if that helped! :)