contestada

What are two arguments you would use to support the claim that medical doctors and veterinarians do not need to collaborate in the way that Natterson-Horowitz is suggesting?

Respuesta :

adefioyelaoye

The two arguments which one could use to support the claim that medical doctors and veterinarians do not need to collaborate in the way that Natterson-Horowitz is suggesting include the following:

  • Veterinarians study multiple fields of the health and disease of organisms such as mammals, amphibians etc while Doctors are only specialized in the human body.
  • There is a huge variation in their operations and their knowledge of the organisms involved.

Who is a Doctor?

This is referred to as a healthcare professional who specializes in taking care of the sick and ensuring that health is restored through the diagnosis and treatment of patients.

They are also referred to as physician and only take care of humans while veterinarians take care of other organisms. There is a huge variation in the knowledge and operations which is why the claim by Natterson-Horowitz will be supported.

Read more about Doctor here https://brainly.com/question/925545

#SPJ1

Otras preguntas