Respuesta :
I agree with the second school of thought on human decision-making as organised decision-making is quite common and is likely to be governed by rules and procedures inside an organisation. This will enable decision-makers to reach a similar decision in a conflict.
Human decision-making is typically studied as the result of a comprehensive evaluation of many possibilities in terms of the likelihood and value of outcomes associated with these options. The normative theory based on these premises that is arguably the most popular is the subjective expected utility theory. A considerable amount of study concentrates on systematic violations of these rationality principles in order to better comprehend the cognitive processes that underlie human judgement and decision making. According to study on them, heuristics are mental shortcuts that people use when making decisions. People in the first group hold the opinion that people are fundamentally illogical and frequently make terrible decisions based on instinct, emotions, or circumstance. It is an ill-considered decision. Members of the second group contend that although humans occasionally make bad decisions, they do so on a regular basis.
Learn more about 'human decision making' here:
https://brainly.com/question/1249089
#SPJ4
