Respuesta :
According to Justice William Brennan Jr.'s 6-2 majority opinion in Baker v. Carr, federal courts may get involved in legislative apportionment disputes.
What result of Baker v. Carr was the most important?
The court determined that apportionment cases are justiciable, ruling 6-2 in the plaintiffs' favor (i.e., that federal courts have the authority to get involved in these disputes).
Justice William Brennan, Jr.'s opinion for the 6-2 majority in Baker v. Carr stated that apportionment disputes could be brought before federal courts. No matter where a person lives, the case established that their vote should count equally for everyone. In the landmark 1962 decision Baker v. Carr, the U.S. Supreme Court established that federal courts could review claims that redistricting, or the drafting of electoral boundaries by a state, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
What were the key details in Baker v. Carr in 1961?
A 1901 law intended to distribute seats for the state's General Assembly, according to Baker and other Tennessee residents, was allegedly largely disregarded. Baker's lawsuit explained how Tennessee's efforts at reapportionment disregarded the state's major economic growth and population changes.
Learn more about Baker v. Carr: https://brainly.com/question/29398442
#SPJ4
