critics of compatibilist freedom, like rowe, say that merely being able to act according to your desires without constraints is not real freedom if

Respuesta :

Merely being able to act according to your desires without constraints is not real freedom if your desires are determined for you in the first place.

The idea of compatibilism holds that free will and determinism can both be held without being incoherent from a logical standpoint. According to compatibilists, freedom can exist or not in circumstances for things unrelated to metaphysics.

One school of classical compatibilism holds that freedom merely refers to an agent's capacity to act as she pleases in the absence of obstacles that would otherwise prevent her from doing so.

Numerous compatibilists agree that a causative chain of events that stretches back in time forever is compatible with natural laws, an omniscient God's purpose, or other deterministic theories.

They assert that we are free as long as our own will is a part of that causal chain. And they believe that the very potential of logic and reason is connected to causation in nature.

They assert that without causality, we could not be certain of the veracity of our claims.

To know more about compatibilism, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6903091

#SPJ4