The right answer is B, as in the Romantic period virtuosity developed enormously. It was more versatile, bright and impressive. However, it should be mentioned that all the contrasting ideas were impossible to express succinctly, so romantic concertos were mostly longer than classical ones. Also, the role of orchestra increased significantly. It was opposed to the hero, soloist. In previous concerts the interaction soloist-orchestra was just a competition, while in the romantic concertos it was a supreme opposition and conflict. Regarding the last answer, it is also true in some extent, as the soloist in romantic concertos had more freedom and opportunities for improvisation.
The Romantic concerto differ from earlier types of concertos as they placed more emphasis on virtuosity throughout the piece. Option B is correct.
Option B is correct.
A concerto is a musical mixture for a lone instrument that is accomplished by an orchestra, particularly one conceptualized on a comparatively large scale.
As in the Romantic period, skill developed hugely. It was more versatile, gleaming and amazing or imperative.
However, it should be adverted that all the different ideas were hopeless to convey compactly, so romantic classical music were largely endless or longer than classical ones.
Also, the role of orchestra gained importantly. It was struggled to the hero and soloist.
In former plans the action of soloist-orchestra was conscionable a competition, while in the romantic concertos it was a supreme resistance and battle.
Considering the last answer, it is also true in some level, as the soloist in romantic concertos had more freedom and chances for creation.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about concerto, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8138634
