What is the main idea in this ruling? How could it impact United States v. Fields? Write a two- to three-sentence response that answers both questions.

The United States v. Fields could impact the public officials cannot victim libel unless, the false statement in the United States I think is a big impact and a crime. Field never served in the military so they consider that was convicted under stolen value.

Answer Link

sohail09753 sohail09753 · Answer 2 · 2022-01-25T09:41:03+01:00

The case of the United States v. Fields may have an impact on public officials' ability to sue for libel unless they make a false statement in the United States, which I believe has a significant impact and is a felony.

The rule of Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court ruled in this decision that states must show that a person made a false statement with malice. a wish to hurt someone is referred to as the conscious of the choice that has been made.

This case is relevant to mine because it demonstrates how speech can be restricted for content grounds if malice is shown. Field never served in the military, so he was convicted on the basis of stolen property.

To know more about the United States v. Fields here:

https://brainly.com/question/10614811