could a photograph be considered a primary source. Why or why not

Question

23-09-2015
Social Studies

contestada

could a photograph be considered a primary source. Why or why not

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

For methyl chloride at 100°C the second and third virial coefficients are: B = −242.5 cm 3 ·mol −1 C = 25,200 cm 6 ·mol −2 Calculate the work of mechanically re

In an experiment where RAs nominated the most competitive and cooperative people in their dorms, and these people then played a game labeled as either "Wall Str

Which explains why factory owners' profits grew quickly during the Industrial Revolution? Factories were making more products to sell by using cheaper labor. Fa

Select the correct answer. A light wave travels at a speed of 3.0 × 108 meters/second. If the wavelength is 7.0 × 10-7 meters, what is the frequency of the wave

Who or what is the speaker in sonnet 9

2. One of the many methods used for drying air is to cool the air below the dew point so that condensation or freezing of the moisture takes place. To what temp

A 10% increase in the price of movie ticket in Westridge 8 leads to a 15% decrease in the number of tickets sold, indicating the demand for movie ticket in West

4FeS2 + 11O2 > 2Fe2O3 + 8SO2 Given 75.0 grams of iron (IV) sulfide, how many grams of sulfur dioxide are produced?

If you were an editor of a teen magazine, would you print a story about a movie star who overdoses on illegal drugs? Explain your answer.

Boo12Boo16 Boo12Boo16 · Answer 1 · 2015-09-23T01:26:13+02:00

Boo12Boo16 Boo12Boo16

23-09-2015

Yes, because it's a picture taken of the event. You know a secondary source is something that DID NOT take part of or witness the event, so a Primary source is something that DID take part of, or witness the event. So a picture would be a Primary source.

Answer Link

mya503 mya503 · Answer 2 · 2015-09-23T01:30:23+02:00

mya503 mya503

23-09-2015

It depends because of the person was there then yes but if the person was not there then no.

Answer Link