hai122
contestada

Since the beginning of time, some people have believed that the Earth is flat. Beginning around 300 B.C., however, some began to wonder if the Earth is actually spherical in shape. Those that favored the flat Earth theory made the following observations: The Earth is stable because it is a flat landmass sandwiched between a flat layer of air and a flat layer of water. If the Earth is spherical, then oceans should be curved on top, but they aren't. Some rivers flow for hundreds of miles but only fall a few feet. The rivers should fall farther if the Earth is spherical. If the Earth is spherical, people and animals that inhabit the Earth would notice as they walked along its surface. Since mariners are able to use flat compasses to navigate their ships without crashing, the Earth must not be a sphere. Those that disputed the flat Earth theory countered the claim by observing that Christopher Columbus was able to sail around the Earth without falling off the edge and later, by presenting satellite imagery taken from space of a spherical Earth. This example demonstrates that
A. scientific knowledge is unattainable.
B. argumentation is a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
C. it is easy to resolve a scientific argument.
D. it is not possible to settle a dispute.

Respuesta :

B. argumentation is a necessary part of scientific inquiry because the others don't make sense. it IS possible to set a dispute and scientific knowledge IS attainable so A and D are ruled out. It can be easy to resolve a scientific argument but sometimes like this one, it can take many years. That leaves B as the most logical answer. Hope that helps.

Answer:

The correct answer will be option-B.

Explanation:

A scientific investigation is based on the systematic procedure to understand and explain the scientific question related to the natural phenomenon.

A scientific question before considering it as an objective question with one real answer is considered a subjective question.  This subjectivity leads to different opinions of the scientific people which leads to the arguments in the scientific method.

This argumentation is the necessary component of the scientific investigation as it provides various hypothesis related to the scientific questions which have to be proved. Out of this hypothesis, only one hypothesis explains the phenomenon in depth.

Therefore in the given question opinions related to the shape of the earth over time has shown that argumentation is a part of the scientific method.

Thus, option-B is the correct answer.