Write a paragraph in which you argue whether or not Rainsford’s final action in "The Most Dangerous Game” is justifie

Question

21-11-2017
English

contestada

Write a paragraph in which you argue whether or not Rainsford’s final action in "The Most Dangerous Game” is justifie

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Read the following paragraph and describe the sensory details used for description. As / was growing up in the 60's, television was the only entertainment my fa

When driving at night with other traffic, you should not look directly at oncoming headlights. Instead, Choose an answer: A. Watch the right edge of your lane,

The president of Deal Corporation wrote to Boyd, offering to sell the Deal factory for $300,000. The offer was sent by Deal on June 5 and was received by Boyd o

i.When he could not attempt even the easiest question in the paper, he felt himself as ________________.

Bond appraisals are used in the municipal secondary market because:_______. I the market is thin II the market is active III trades are reported to a consolidat

Price elasticity of demand of a commodity is – 0.5. Its quantity demanded falls by 5 units when its price rises by Rs1/unit. Calculate the quantity demanded if

A 400 N steel ball is suspended by a light rope fromthe ceiling. The tension in the rope is

10. Which list shows the correct order of the spread of Buddhism in Asia? A. China, Japan, Korea C. KoreaChinaJapan 3. China Korea Japan D. Korea Japan China

What is the measure of ZABD? A. 329 B. 589 C. 640 D. 1489 E. 180

Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition I love horses and want to be a veterinarian

castielnovak112 castielnovak112 · Answer 1 · 2017-12-04T21:15:11+01:00

There is nothing to suggest that Zaroff would have quit killing humans, he was a static character, and therefore he did not change even when he "lost" to Rainsford. In the reading, Rainsford is doing his part to mankind by eliminating the harrowing threat of Zaroff to any other unfortunate person, and after all there is no legal justice system to persecute Rainsford on the island. If Rainsford did not kill Zaroff, then inevitably he would have died.

gonzalezdeisy0000 gonzalezdeisy0000 · Answer 2 · 2020-12-09T21:05:32+01:00

Answer:

Rainsford final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified. If Rainsford would have let General Zaroff live then more lives would have been in danger. In the article, Rainsford found out that General Zaroff hunted men as a game, and once he finds these men he kills them. If the General would not have been killed by Rainsford more lives would have been lost. It would be better if one life was lost then many more being lost. Secondly, General Zaroff did say that he would let Rainsford free if he won the game, but Rainsford knew that he could not be trusted. After Rainsford won the game, General Rainsford told him he can sleep in a special bed as a reward, but Rainsford knew this was a trick. General Zaroff is a very cruel and evil person, and Rainsford knew that it was a trick because General Rainsford never used the bed. This is why Rainsford final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified due to the general's action. Rainsford might have not killed the general in self defense, but he saved many more lives doing this action.

Explanation:

I did this on edg.

Hope this helps!! Have a great day!!!