Answer:
If a judge agrees with outcome of case, but not with reasoning of the majority, the judge may submit a concurring opinion.
Explanation:
If a judge agrees with outcome of case, but not with reasoning of the majority, the judge may submit a concurring opinion.
Unless, on the grounds of evaluating the case, no actual majority of the court may consent, the court's ruling may be found in a variety of concurrent opinions, and the concurrent opinion reached by the largest number of judges is considered the plurality opinion.
