Answer:
Santa Anna was a bad leader, Austin a cunning one.
Explanation:
Santa Anna was an egocentrist leader. He was megalomanous, something shown in his insistence to be portaryed as the "Napoleon of the West". An example of this was the building of a monument to his leg, that was amputated after he faced an Spanish invasion in Tampico, and that stood in Mexico City. But in contrast to this, he was also interested in a good life, with no personal allegiance (he switch sides whenever he thought it adequate) and also in the fact that he was overconfident. The lat could be seen in the Battle of San Jacinto, when he neglected fortfying his camp, and sent the order the order to have a nap.
Stephen Austin was in contrast a temperate leader, and a cunning negotiator. This could be seen in his deals with the Mexican government throughout the perod 1825-1835, and in his leadership in the Texian government, although he was bested by Sam Houston, and because he died less than two months of the independence of Texas.
