Respuesta :
Triangle NRM has legs m and n, and r is the length of its longest side.
and given that ⇒ r² = m² + n²
Ben constructed a right triangle EFD with legs m and n
so, both of the triangles NRM and EFD have legs with sides m and n
beside that the third side of NRM is equal to the third side EFD, i.e ⇒ r = f
which is proved from the statement number 4
So, the sides of the triangle NRM are congruent to the sides of triangle EFD
So, the reason which best fits statement 5 is ⇒ [tex]\framebox {SSS \ Postulate} [/tex]
and given that ⇒ r² = m² + n²
Ben constructed a right triangle EFD with legs m and n
so, both of the triangles NRM and EFD have legs with sides m and n
beside that the third side of NRM is equal to the third side EFD, i.e ⇒ r = f
which is proved from the statement number 4
So, the sides of the triangle NRM are congruent to the sides of triangle EFD
So, the reason which best fits statement 5 is ⇒ [tex]\framebox {SSS \ Postulate} [/tex]
Answer:
Option "SSS postulate" is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that: Triangle NRM has legs m and n, and r is the length of its longest side.
and r² = m² + n².
Now, Ben constructed a right triangle EFD with legs m and n.
and in statement 4, it is proved that f=r.
So, all the three sides of the triangles NMR and EFD are congruent.
So, the triangles are congruent bt the SSS Postulate.
⇒ option "SSS postulate" is correct.