Which term refers to an opinion written by a justice in the majority that outlines additional considerations he or she thinks are important?

Question

26-03-2018
Social Studies

contestada

Which term refers to an opinion written by a justice in the majority that outlines additional considerations he or she thinks are important?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Tom is at McDonalds and he sees that 2 burgers cost $40. He needs 12 burgers. How mu ch will 12 burgers cost?

A group of students have the following house numbers: 29, 39, 59, and 79. Randy's house number is a composite number. What is Randy's house number?

while roping a fence post Jane catches the post 5/6 of the time .Time catches the post 3/4 of the time who catches the post more frequently and by how much

what longer length or width

Read the excerpt from Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, and then complete the sentences that follow. But he looked hollow and went soberly. Right threadbare was h

Who won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824? A.Thomas Gibbons, because he was doing business in just one state. B.Aaron Ogden, because he was doing business in mo

you have 9.75 pages in your science book and 24.5 pages in your play book it takes you 1.2 minutes to read your science book and 0.8 minutes to read your play

Sue wants to use mental math to find 7x53. Write an expression she could use

Physical and chemical properties of a piece of cooked chicken and a glass of kool-aid

Which fraction equals -9/16 A) -3/4 B) 9/-16 C) 9/16 D) 3/4

Yukihime Yukihime · Answer 1 · 2018-06-11T13:39:47+02:00

I believe the correct answer is: Concurring opinion.

The concurring opinion is the term used in law that refers to an opinion written by judge/judges of court which agrees with the majority, but outlines additional considerations (different reasons) he or she thinks are important.
Even though Concurring opinions can’t change the final decision, but can serve as a persuasive argument for lawyers, in many legal systems these opinions are not reported as the court "speaks with one voice".

holesstanham holesstanham · Answer 2 · 2019-04-28T01:07:11+02:00

Answer:

Concurring opinions

Explanation:

Concurring opinions are those that agree with the majority decision, but outline additional elements. This could be because a particular judge reached the same outcome as the majority but did so due to different reasons. It could also be that the judge wants to bring attention to additional details not considered in the majority decision. Although concurring opinions are not binding precedent, they can be useful as a type of persuasive argument.