Sally goes to have her hair trimmed and agrees to pay $40 to the stylist. While there, Sally decides that she would also like highlights. The stylist informs her that highlights will cost an additional $30. Sally agrees to the price, gets the highlights, but refuses to pay the extra amount. What is the likely result in a dispute between Sally and the stylist, and why?Multiple ChoiceThe stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; therefore, Sally's promise was supported by valid consideration.The stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; therefore, a valid unilateral contract existed.The stylist will win unless Sally can show that she had previously received both a trim and highlights for $40. If she can prove that she previously received both for $40, the “past expectations” rule applies.Sally will win because the stylist had a preexisting duty to have her hair looking its finest.Sally will win because there was no valid consideration given in exchange for the highlighting.

Question

22-07-2019
Business

contestada

Sally goes to have her hair trimmed and agrees to pay $40 to the stylist. While there, Sally decides that she would also like highlights. The stylist informs her that highlights will cost an additional $30. Sally agrees to the price, gets the highlights, but refuses to pay the extra amount. What is the likely result in a dispute between Sally and the stylist, and why?Multiple ChoiceThe stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; therefore, Sally's promise was supported by valid consideration.The stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; therefore, a valid unilateral contract existed.The stylist will win unless Sally can show that she had previously received both a trim and highlights for $40. If she can prove that she previously received both for $40, the “past expectations” rule applies.Sally will win because the stylist had a preexisting duty to have her hair looking its finest.Sally will win because there was no valid consideration given in exchange for the highlighting.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Give an example of a 2 x 2 matrix game with exactly three nash equilibria in pure strategies. Explain.

Read the following passage. My friend Maya lives by the park. Maya lives in a quiet area. it is quiet if you live by a park. This is an example of which type of

Online content that has been created and posted by unpaid contributors such as customers or fans of a product or service is referred to as:.

What jobs should require personality tests prior to hiring a candidate?

Suppose a mouse develops loss of sodium pump activity in the thick ascending limb of the loop of henle in all of the nephrons in both kidneys. What problem woul

How do I study other subjects other than Math on Brainly?

he only stable isotope of fluorine is F. What type of radioactivity would you expect from the isotope F, which has one fewer neutron

O 40 O 13 O 80 05 R T 8x 12x + 20

Find the indicated IQ score. The graph to the right depicts IQ scores of adults, and those scores are normally distributed with a mean of 100 and a standard de

Amanda is a teacher working with a student named Chanse. Previously, when Chanse laughed loudly at the other kids in the class, Amanda spoke with him and asked

RenatoMattice RenatoMattice · Answer 1 · 2019-07-29T13:02:58+02:00

Answer: The stylist will win because she did additional work in exchange for the extra payment; therefore, Sally's promise was supported by valid consideration.

Explanation:

The stylist will win the argument. The alteration is enforceable since it is supported by cerebration for both parties-Sally will get the highlights that had not been enclosed in the primary contract for the haircut, and the stylist will get the additional money.