1dal1a
contestada

I'm honestly not sure if this fits in this subject (concerning debating), but here goes:
When debating, if the other team has an argument or rebuttal that you or a teammate will address in their written speech later, is it in your best interests to rebut now or wait until your/your teammate's argument?


If rebutting now, should you/your teammate still state your/their argument later or have it cut out completely?


If waiting until your/your teammate's argument later on, should you say something like "I/My teammate will address this in their speech" even if that topic isn't brought up a lot later on in the debate?


Both ways might make you lose points on Matter... is there a better way?

Repost because annoying spam bots giving virus links

Respuesta :

Answer:

primero, es mejor primero antes de refutar es revisar si sus argumentos pueden complementar la refutación de la idea del otro equipo. No SOY BOT SOLO QUE EL INGLES ME RESULTA UN POCO DIFICIL DE ESCRIBIR, ES POR ESO QUE MIS RESPUETAS LAS ESCRIBO EN ESPAÑOL, PARA QUE USTED LAS PUEDA TRADUCIR.

Para las demás pregutnas si es conveniente porque le da más formalidad a lo que esta diciendo por lo tanto, va a tener más credibilidad

Explanation: