Answer:
The 17th Amendment would be considered a reform because it tackled corruption and inefficiency in the election of senators. The 17th Amendment would be considered a reform because it tackled corruption and inefficiency in the election of senators. This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.
Explanation:
Hop this helps you
The United States Constitution was amended in 1913 to include the Seventeenth Amendment, which allowed for the direct election of senators by state people. The Constitution's Article I, Section 3's electoral system, which called for the state legislatures to nominate senators, was modified by this amendment.
Due to the Seventeenth Amendment, alleged interference was reduced and the right balance of power between the federal government and the states was conserved.
During the time when the 17th amendment was adopted, several states had already put in place direct election of their state's senators (e.g., by having the legislature appoint the winners of party primaries).
It was widely agreed that the ammendment was required to lessen the impact of big business and other special interests on senatorial selection. It also helped to avoid vacancies or frequent turnover in the Senate brought on by intra-party disputes or shifts in party leadership at the state level.
To learn more about 17 th amendment, refer
https://brainly.com/question/8813331
#SPJ2
